<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ululating Undulating Ungulate &#187; big names in art</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ululating-undulating-ungulate.com/tag/big-names-in-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ululating-undulating-ungulate.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 03:27:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>2009 Art Sales May Not Have Been Bad For Auction Houses, But Was It Good For Art?</title>
		<link>http://www.ululating-undulating-ungulate.com/2010/01/2009-art-sales-may-not-have-been-bad-for-auction-houses-but-was-it-good-for-art/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ululating-undulating-ungulate.com/2010/01/2009-art-sales-may-not-have-been-bad-for-auction-houses-but-was-it-good-for-art/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deanna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collecting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art auction tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big names in art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modern Vs. Masters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ululating-undulating-ungulate.com/?p=216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Antique Week, Vol. 41, Issue No. 2112 (January 11, 2010) has a report in the national section on art sales in 2009.

In the article, two things stood out for me.
First:
Auction houses started slashing pre-sale estimates by as much as 50 percent to stimulate sales.  When Sloans &#38; Kenyon of Chevy Chase, Md., gave a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ululating-undulating-ungulate.com/2010/01/2009-art-sales-may-not-have-been-bad-for-auction-houses-but-was-it-good-for-art/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fauning Over Maclise</title>
		<link>http://www.ululating-undulating-ungulate.com/2009/12/fauning-over-maclise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ululating-undulating-ungulate.com/2009/12/fauning-over-maclise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deanna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Painting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art nudes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big names in art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairies and nymphs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fauns and satyrs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ululating-undulating-ungulate.com/?p=88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several people must have been fauning fawning over R.A. Daniel Maclise&#8217;s Pan And The Dancing Fairies (The Faun And The Fairies) because the pretty painted piece sold for 301,250  GBP (roughly $498,509  in US dollars) at Sotheby&#8217;s Victorian &#38; Edwardian Art auction held December 17th, 2009.

I show it to you merely because it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ululating-undulating-ungulate.com/2009/12/fauning-over-maclise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Breath Of Spring Air</title>
		<link>http://www.ululating-undulating-ungulate.com/2009/12/a-breath-of-spring-air/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ululating-undulating-ungulate.com/2009/12/a-breath-of-spring-air/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deanna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Illustration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sketch Book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big names in art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enjoying art on a bad day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fashion sketch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vintage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ululating-undulating-ungulate.com/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lovely fashion sketch by Sir Cecil Beaton, which wafts off my monitor and makes my heart lighter&#8230;

In non-art related news, I&#8217;ve been spending all weekend cleaning my home, laying down poison and traps, all to rid myself of an unwanted, non-pet, mouse.  I can understand him wanting to move in here; it&#8217;s already [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ululating-undulating-ungulate.com/2009/12/a-breath-of-spring-air/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hugh Grant: Lessons In Buying Art</title>
		<link>http://www.ululating-undulating-ungulate.com/2009/12/hugh-grant-lessons-in-buying-art/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ululating-undulating-ungulate.com/2009/12/hugh-grant-lessons-in-buying-art/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deanna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buying Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Painting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big names in art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporary art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugh Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pop art]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ululating-undulating-ungulate.com/?p=50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the January 2010 issue of Elle magazine, there&#8217;s an interview of Hugh Grant by Holly Millea. Whatever you think of Grant, there&#8217;s an interesting bit on the actor as an art collector.
Elle: Tell me, is it true that you bought an Andy Warhol painting of Elizabeth Taylor for $4 million in 2002 and sold [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ululating-undulating-ungulate.com/2009/12/hugh-grant-lessons-in-buying-art/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Jackson: King Of Commissioned Kitsch</title>
		<link>http://www.ululating-undulating-ungulate.com/2009/12/michael-jackson-king-of-commissioned-kitsch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ululating-undulating-ungulate.com/2009/12/michael-jackson-king-of-commissioned-kitsch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deanna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commercial Success?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Painting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big names in art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commissioned art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kitsch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paintings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pop culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[you couldn't do worse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ululating-undulating-ungulate.com/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We keep hearing how poor MJ was, but the dude spent a fortune commissioning art &#8212; of himself.  And while he was one helluva a musical artist &#38; entertainer, he didn&#8217;t have a clue about art.
Just unveiled, Kehinde Wiley’s monumental commissioned portrait of Michael Jackson:

And here&#8217;s a 1990 painting of Jackson by David Nordahl:

Now [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ululating-undulating-ungulate.com/2009/12/michael-jackson-king-of-commissioned-kitsch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
